The Role And Nature Of The Doctoral Dissertation

  • Archbald, D. (2010). “Breaking the mold” in the dissertation: Implementing a problem based, decision-oriented thesis project. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 58(2), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Beebe, J. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Bhoyrub, J., Hurley, J., Neilson, G. R., Ramsay, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Heutagogy: An alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bouck, B. M. (2011). Scholar-practitioner identity: A liminal perspective. Scholar Practitioner Quarterly, 5(2), 201–210.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Butlerman-Bos, J. A. (2008). Will a clinical approach make education research more relevant for practice? Educational Researcher, 37(7), 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Christensen, C., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.Google Scholar

  • Costley, C., & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: Professional extension at the highest levels. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 257–269. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.503344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). CGS task force report on the professional doctorate. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar

  • Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy & Theory41(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education, Oryx.Google Scholar

  • Dawson, K., & Kumar, S. (2014). An analysis of professional practice Ed.D. dissertations in educational technology. TechTrends, 58(4), 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • De Jong, M. J., Moser, D. K., & Hall, L. A. (2005). The manuscript option dissertation: Multiple perspectives. Nurse Author & Editor, 15(3), 7–9.Google Scholar

  • Donovan, G. T. (2013). MyDigitalFootprint.ORG: Young people and proprietary ecology of everyday data. Retrieved from: http://mydigitalfootprint.org/dissertation/.Google Scholar

  • Drake, P., & Heath, L. (2011). Practitioner research at doctoral level: Developing coherent research methodologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Duke, N. K., & Beck, S. W. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Research, 28(3), 31–36.Google Scholar

  • Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M., & Summers, J. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Finch, B. (1998). Developing the skills for evidence-based practice. Nurse Education Today, 18(1), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fulton, J., Kuit, J., Sanders, G., & Smith, P. (2012). The role of the Professional Doctorate in developing professional practice. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(1), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, D., Alhusen, J., & Jennings, B. M. (2012). Authorship ethics with the dissertation manuscript option. Research in Nursing & Health, 35(5), 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Guthrie, J. W. (2009). The case for a modern doctor of education degree (EdD): Multipurpose education doctorates no longer appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Gutierrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hochbein, C., & Perry, J. A. (2013). The role of research in the professional doctorate. Planning & Changing, 44(3/4), 181–195.Google Scholar

  • Holmes, B. D., Seay, A. D., & Wilson, K. N. (2009). Re-envisioning the dissertation stage of doctoral study: Traditional mistakes with non-traditional learners. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(8), 9–13.Google Scholar

  • Jarvis, P. (1999a). The practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

  • Jarvis, P. (1999b). Global trends in lifelong learning and the response of the universities. Comparative Education, 35(2), 249–257. Retrieved from r0/docview/195149382?accountid=98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Shunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 23–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. E, & Swanson, R. A. (2012). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Kram, K. E., Wasserman, I. C., & Yip, J. (2012). Metaphors of identity and professional practice: Learning from the scholar-practitioner. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(3), 304–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvementguide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Margolin, V. (2010). Doctoral education in design: Problems and prospects. Design Issues, 26(3), 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Review, 1(1), 33–57. Retrieved from http://www.tcpea.org/slr/2005/murphy.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Patton, S. (2013). The dissertation can no longer be defended. Chronicles of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://ida.lib.uidaho.edu:2282/article/The-DissertationCan-No-Longer/137215/

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: Random House.Google Scholar

  • Prewitt, K. (2006). Who should do what? Implications for institutional and national leaders. In C. Golde & G. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education (pp. 23–33). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

  • Professional Doctorate in Educational Leadership [ProDEL]. (2012). Dissertation in practice guidelines (DP-2.2-Fa12). Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA: Author.Google Scholar

  • QAA. (2011). Doctoral degree qualifications. London, UK: QAA.Google Scholar

  • Reid, W. M. (1978). Will the future generations of biologists write a dissertation? Bioscience, 28, 651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Reardon, R. M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2013). Criterion-inspired, emergent design in doctoral education: A critical friend perspective. In V. A. Storey (Ed.), Redesigning professional education doctorates: Application of critical friendship theory to the EdD (pp. 177–194). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, S., & Dracup, K. (2008). Innovative options for the doctoral dissertation in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 56(4), 174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Shulman, L. S. (2010, April 4). Doctoral education shouldn’t be a marathon. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(30), B9–B12.Google Scholar

  • Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, S. (2014). Beyond the dissertation monograph. Reprinted from the Spring 2010 MLA Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.mla.org/blog&topic=133Google Scholar

  • Smith, S., Sanders, G., Fulton, J., & Kuit, J. (2014). An alternative approach to the final assessment of professional doctorate candidates. Paper presented at 4th International Conference on Professional Doctorates, April 10–11, 2014, Cardiff, Wales: United Kingdom Council on Graduate Education.Google Scholar

  • Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening: A visual-verbal inquiry into learning in many dimensions. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674744431.Google Scholar

  • Stevens, D. A. (2010). A comparison of non-traditional capstone experiences in Ed.D. programs at three highly selective private research universities (Order No. 3418175). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: Social Sciences; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global: Social Sciences (750445117). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/750445117?accountid=9817Google Scholar

  • Storey, V. A., & Hartwick, P. (2010). Critical friends: Supporting a small, private university face the challenges of crafting an innovative scholar-practitioner doctorate. In G. Jean-Marie & A. H. Normore (Eds.), Educational leadership preparation: Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches to the EdD and graduate education (pp. 111–133). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Storey, V. A., & Maughan, B. D. (2014). Beyond a definition: Designing and specifying Dissertation in Practice (DiP) models. Pittsburgh, PA: The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. Retrieved from: http://cpedinitiative.org/findingsGoogle Scholar

  • Storey, V. A., & Richard, B. (2013). Critical friend groups: Moving beyond mentoring. In V. A. Storey (Ed.), Redesigning professional education doctorates: Application of critical friendship theory to the EdD (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: Supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools, 7(3), 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, R. (2015). The effectiveness of alternative dissertation models in graduate education. Unpublished master’s thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, R., West, R., & Rich, P. (2015). The effectiveness ofalternative dissertation models in graduate education. Under Review. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar

  • Vanderbilt University Peabody College (2015). Ed.D. Capstone Experience. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/departments/lpo/graduate_and_professional_programs/edd/capstone_experience/index.phpGoogle Scholar

  • Willis, J., Inman, D., & Valenti, R. (2010). Completing a professional practice dissertation: A guide for doctoral students and faculty. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Zusman, A. (2013). How new kinds of professional doctorates are changing higher education institutions. Research & Occasional Paper Series: 8.13. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

  • The Journal of Higher Education

    Description:

    Founded in 1930, The Journal of Higher Education (JHE) is the leading scholarly journal on the institution of higher education. Articles combine disciplinary methods with critical insight to investigate issues important to faculty, administrators, and program managers.
    The Journal of Higher Education is an independent refereed journal. Through full-length articles, commentary, and book reviews, JHE encourages creation of effective policy solutions and enhancement of professional development in all areas within the university, the four-year college, and the community college.

    Coverage: 1930-2011 (Vol. 1, No. 1 - Vol. 82, No. 6)

    Moving Wall: 12/31/2011 year (What is the moving wall?)

    The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal. Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
    Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
    For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.

    Terms Related to the Moving Wall
    Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.
    Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.
    Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been combined with another title.

    Coverage presently ends: 2011. JSTOR will resume a moving wall of 7 years in 2019.

    ISSN: 00221546

    EISSN: 15384640

    Subjects: Education, Social Sciences

    Collections: Arts & Sciences I Collection, JSTOR Essential Collection

    0 comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *